tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3242285114366754590.comments2009-01-28T21:20:30.126+00:00MarginaliaL.D. Durbinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07687806296090269259noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3242285114366754590.post-55052311853464507162009-01-28T21:20:00.000+00:002009-01-28T21:20:00.000+00:00Thank you, Sara.Thank you, Sara.L.D. Durbinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07687806296090269259noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3242285114366754590.post-65812907951823362222009-01-24T02:18:00.000+00:002009-01-24T02:18:00.000+00:00Even after many years, it's still beautiful.Even after many years, it's still beautiful.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3242285114366754590.post-12024574718896212762008-12-12T20:38:00.000+00:002008-12-12T20:38:00.000+00:00Miscellaneous thought, because I am in a slightly ...Miscellaneous thought, because I am in a slightly anti-university mode at the moment. It is possible to view closed journals as being in the interest of not just publishers but also universities. Obviously journals are a cost to universities, but they benefit from economies of scale to spread the cost.<BR/><BR/>Meanwhile, access to journals is one of the benefits universities offer students and researchers. If articles were freely available, making smaller scale and independent study and research more feasible, how would this affect universities?Timhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16909425215873991491noreply@blogger.com